Files
dependency-review-action/__tests__/summary.test.ts
Copilot 2af9bac14d Add patched version column to vulnerability summary with multi-range support (#5)
* Initial plan

* Initial plan for adding patched versions to vulnerability summary

Co-authored-by: felickz <1760475+felickz@users.noreply.github.com>

* Add patched version column to vulnerability summary table

Co-authored-by: felickz <1760475+felickz@users.noreply.github.com>

* Optimize API calls to use Set and Promise.all for better performance

Co-authored-by: felickz <1760475+felickz@users.noreply.github.com>

* Remove type assertions and optimize ecosystem lookups with normalization

Co-authored-by: felickz <1760475+felickz@users.noreply.github.com>

* Extract patch version type checking into helper function for clarity

Co-authored-by: felickz <1760475+felickz@users.noreply.github.com>

* Support multiple version ranges per package in advisory lookup

Handle scenarios where the same package has multiple vulnerable version ranges
with different patched versions (e.g., GHSA-gwq6-fmvp-qp68 with .NET packages).

- Store all vulnerability entries with version ranges, not just one per ecosystem
- Implement version range matching to select correct patch version
- Match package by ecosystem, name, AND version range
- Add comprehensive test for multi-range scenario

Co-authored-by: felickz <1760475+felickz@users.noreply.github.com>

* Fix first_patched_version extraction to handle string format

The GitHub Advisory API returns first_patched_version as a simple string
(e.g., "112.0.0"), not an object with an identifier field. Updated
extractPatchVersionId to handle string format primarily while maintaining
backward compatibility with object format.

- Fixed extractPatchVersionId to check for string first
- Updated test mocks to match actual API response format
- Added specific test for RestSharp GHSA-4rr6-2v9v-wcpc case
- Verified with actual API responses from multiple advisories

Fixes issue where patched versions were showing as "N/A" instead of
the actual version number.

Co-authored-by: felickz <1760475+felickz@users.noreply.github.com>

* Rebuild dist with patched version fix

The previous fix to extractPatchVersionId wasn't deployed because the dist/
folder (compiled JavaScript) wasn't rebuilt. This commit rebuilds and packages
the action with npm run build && npm run package to include the fix.

Changes in dist/:
- Updated extractPatchVersionId to handle string format first
- Includes all async vulnerability summary logic with API calls
- Properly extracts patched versions from GitHub Advisory API

This should resolve the issue where patched versions showed as "N/A" in
actual GitHub Actions runs.

Co-authored-by: felickz <1760475+felickz@users.noreply.github.com>

* Add comprehensive debug logging for patch version lookup

Added detailed debug logging to help troubleshoot patch version issues:
- Log when fetching advisory data from API
- Log number of vulnerability entries found
- Log each patch info entry added with details
- Log when no patch version is found
- Log during lookup phase with package details
- Log when patch version is found vs not found
- Log available entries when no match is found

This will make it much easier to diagnose issues in GitHub Actions debug mode.

Co-authored-by: felickz <1760475+felickz@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: felickz <1760475+felickz@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-02-06 18:12:20 -05:00

642 lines
18 KiB
TypeScript

import {expect, jest, test, beforeEach} from '@jest/globals'
import {Changes, ConfigurationOptions, Scorecard} from '../src/schemas'
import * as summary from '../src/summary'
import * as core from '@actions/core'
import {createTestChange} from './fixtures/create-test-change'
import {createTestVulnerability} from './fixtures/create-test-vulnerability'
import * as utils from '../src/utils'
const mockOctokitRequest = jest.fn<any>()
beforeEach(() => {
jest.spyOn(utils, 'octokitClient').mockReturnValue({
request: mockOctokitRequest
} as any)
mockOctokitRequest.mockResolvedValue({
data: {vulnerabilities: []}
})
})
afterEach(() => {
jest.clearAllMocks()
core.summary.emptyBuffer()
})
const emptyChanges: Changes = []
const emptyInvalidLicenseChanges = {
forbidden: [],
unresolved: [],
unlicensed: []
}
const emptyScorecard: Scorecard = {
dependencies: []
}
const defaultConfig: ConfigurationOptions = {
vulnerability_check: true,
license_check: true,
fail_on_severity: 'high',
fail_on_scopes: ['runtime'],
allow_ghsas: [],
allow_licenses: [],
deny_licenses: [],
deny_packages: [],
deny_groups: [],
comment_summary_in_pr: true,
retry_on_snapshot_warnings: false,
retry_on_snapshot_warnings_timeout: 120,
warn_only: false,
warn_on_openssf_scorecard_level: 3,
show_openssf_scorecard: false
}
const changesWithEmptyManifests: Changes = [
{
change_type: 'added',
manifest: '',
ecosystem: 'unknown',
name: 'castore',
version: '0.1.17',
package_url: 'pkg:hex/castore@0.1.17',
license: null,
source_repository_url: null,
scope: 'runtime',
vulnerabilities: []
},
{
change_type: 'added',
manifest: '',
ecosystem: 'unknown',
name: 'connection',
version: '1.1.0',
package_url: 'pkg:hex/connection@1.1.0',
license: null,
source_repository_url: null,
scope: 'runtime',
vulnerabilities: []
},
{
change_type: 'added',
manifest: 'python/dist-info/METADATA',
ecosystem: 'pip',
name: 'pygments',
version: '2.6.1',
package_url: 'pkg:pypi/pygments@2.6.1',
license: 'BSD-2-Clause',
source_repository_url: 'https://github.com/pygments/pygments',
scope: 'runtime',
vulnerabilities: []
}
]
const scorecard: Scorecard = {
dependencies: [
{
change: {
change_type: 'added',
manifest: '',
ecosystem: 'unknown',
name: 'castore',
version: '0.1.17',
package_url: 'pkg:hex/castore@0.1.17',
license: null,
source_repository_url: null,
scope: 'runtime',
vulnerabilities: []
},
scorecard: null
}
]
}
test('prints headline as h1', () => {
summary.addSummaryToSummary(
emptyChanges,
emptyInvalidLicenseChanges,
emptyChanges,
scorecard,
defaultConfig
)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain('<h1>Dependency Review</h1>')
})
test('does not add deprecation warning for deny-licenses option if not set', () => {
summary.addSummaryToSummary(
emptyChanges,
emptyInvalidLicenseChanges,
emptyChanges,
scorecard,
defaultConfig
)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).not.toContain('deny-licenses')
})
test('adds deprecation warning for deny-licenses option if set', () => {
const config = {...defaultConfig, deny_licenses: ['MIT']}
summary.addSummaryToSummary(
emptyChanges,
emptyInvalidLicenseChanges,
emptyChanges,
scorecard,
config
)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain('deny-licenses')
})
test('returns minimal summary formatted for posting as a PR comment', () => {
const OLD_ENV = process.env
const changes: Changes = [
createTestChange({name: 'lodash', version: '1.2.3'}),
createTestChange({name: 'colors', version: '2.3.4'}),
createTestChange({name: '@foo/bar', version: '*'})
]
process.env.GITHUB_SERVER_URL = 'https://github.com'
process.env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY = 'owner/repo'
process.env.GITHUB_RUN_ID = 'abc-123-xyz'
const minSummary: string = summary.addSummaryToSummary(
changes,
emptyInvalidLicenseChanges,
emptyChanges,
scorecard,
defaultConfig
)
process.env = OLD_ENV
// note: no Actions context values in unit test env
const expected = `
# Dependency Review
The following issues were found:
* ❌ 3 vulnerable package(s)
* ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
* ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
* ✅ 0 package(s) with unknown licenses.
[View full job summary](https://github.com/owner/repo/actions/runs/abc-123-xyz)
`.trim()
expect(minSummary).toEqual(expected)
})
test('only includes "No vulnerabilities or license issues found"-message if both are configured and nothing was found', () => {
summary.addSummaryToSummary(
emptyChanges,
emptyInvalidLicenseChanges,
emptyChanges,
emptyScorecard,
defaultConfig
)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain('✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues found.')
})
test('only includes "No vulnerabilities found"-message if "license_check" is set to false and nothing was found', () => {
const config = {...defaultConfig, license_check: false}
summary.addSummaryToSummary(
emptyChanges,
emptyInvalidLicenseChanges,
emptyChanges,
emptyScorecard,
config
)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain('✅ No vulnerabilities found.')
})
test('only includes "No license issues found"-message if "vulnerability_check" is set to false and nothing was found', () => {
const config = {...defaultConfig, vulnerability_check: false}
summary.addSummaryToSummary(
emptyChanges,
emptyInvalidLicenseChanges,
emptyChanges,
emptyScorecard,
config
)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain('✅ No license issues found.')
})
test('groups dependencies with empty manifest paths together', () => {
summary.addSummaryToSummary(
changesWithEmptyManifests,
emptyInvalidLicenseChanges,
emptyChanges,
emptyScorecard,
defaultConfig
)
summary.addScannedFiles(changesWithEmptyManifests)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain('Unnamed Manifest')
expect(text).toContain('python/dist-info/METADATA')
})
test('does not include status section if nothing was found', () => {
summary.addSummaryToSummary(
emptyChanges,
emptyInvalidLicenseChanges,
emptyChanges,
emptyScorecard,
defaultConfig
)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).not.toContain('The following issues were found:')
})
test('includes count and status icons for all findings', () => {
const vulnerabilities = [
createTestChange({name: 'lodash'}),
createTestChange({name: 'underscore', package_url: 'test-url'})
]
const licenseIssues = {
forbidden: [createTestChange()],
unresolved: [createTestChange(), createTestChange()],
unlicensed: [createTestChange(), createTestChange(), createTestChange()]
}
summary.addSummaryToSummary(
vulnerabilities,
licenseIssues,
emptyChanges,
emptyScorecard,
defaultConfig
)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain('❌ 2 vulnerable package(s)')
expect(text).toContain(
'❌ 2 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions'
)
expect(text).toContain('❌ 1 package(s) with incompatible licenses')
expect(text).toContain('⚠️ 3 package(s) with unknown licenses')
})
test('uses checkmarks for license issues if only vulnerabilities were found', () => {
const vulnerabilities = [createTestChange()]
summary.addSummaryToSummary(
vulnerabilities,
emptyInvalidLicenseChanges,
emptyChanges,
emptyScorecard,
defaultConfig
)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain('❌ 1 vulnerable package(s)')
expect(text).toContain(
'✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions'
)
expect(text).toContain('✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses')
expect(text).toContain('✅ 0 package(s) with unknown licenses')
})
test('uses checkmarks for vulnerabilities if only license issues were found', () => {
const licenseIssues = {
forbidden: [createTestChange()],
unresolved: [],
unlicensed: []
}
summary.addSummaryToSummary(
emptyChanges,
licenseIssues,
emptyChanges,
emptyScorecard,
defaultConfig
)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain('✅ 0 vulnerable package(s)')
expect(text).toContain(
'✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions'
)
expect(text).toContain('❌ 1 package(s) with incompatible licenses')
expect(text).toContain('✅ 0 package(s) with unknown licenses')
})
test('addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary() - only includes section if any vulnerabilities found', async () => {
await summary.addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary(emptyChanges, 'low')
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toEqual('')
})
test('addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary() - includes all vulnerabilities', async () => {
const changes = [
createTestChange({name: 'lodash'}),
createTestChange({name: 'underscore', package_url: 'test-url'})
]
await summary.addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary(changes, 'low')
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain('<h2>Vulnerabilities</h2>')
expect(text).toContain('lodash')
expect(text).toContain('underscore')
})
test('addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary() - includes advisory url if available', async () => {
const changes = [
createTestChange({
name: 'underscore',
vulnerabilities: [
createTestVulnerability({
advisory_summary: 'test-summary',
advisory_url: 'test-url'
})
]
})
]
await summary.addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary(changes, 'low')
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain('lodash')
expect(text).toContain('<a href="test-url">test-summary</a>')
})
test('addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary() - groups vulnerabilities of a single package', async () => {
const changes = [
createTestChange({
name: 'package-with-multiple-vulnerabilities',
vulnerabilities: [
createTestVulnerability({advisory_summary: 'test-summary-1'}),
createTestVulnerability({advisory_summary: 'test-summary-2'})
]
})
]
await summary.addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary(changes, 'low')
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text.match('package-with-multiple-vulnerabilities')).toHaveLength(1)
expect(text).toContain('test-summary-1')
expect(text).toContain('test-summary-2')
})
test('addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary() - prints severity statement if above low', async () => {
const changes = [createTestChange()]
await summary.addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary(changes, 'medium')
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain(
'Only included vulnerabilities with severity <strong>medium</strong> or higher.'
)
})
test('addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary() - does not print severity statement if it is set to "low"', async () => {
const changes = [createTestChange()]
await summary.addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary(changes, 'low')
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).not.toContain('Only included vulnerabilities')
})
test('addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary() - includes patched version column', async () => {
const changes = [createTestChange()]
await summary.addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary(changes, 'low')
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain('Patched Version')
})
test('addLicensesToSummary() - does not include entire section if no license issues found', () => {
summary.addLicensesToSummary(emptyInvalidLicenseChanges, defaultConfig)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toEqual('')
})
test('addLicensesToSummary() - includes all license issues in table', () => {
const licenseIssues = {
forbidden: [createTestChange()],
unresolved: [createTestChange(), createTestChange()],
unlicensed: [createTestChange(), createTestChange(), createTestChange()]
}
summary.addLicensesToSummary(licenseIssues, defaultConfig)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain('<h2>License Issues</h2>')
expect(text).toContain('<td>Incompatible License</td>')
expect(text).toContain('<td>Invalid SPDX License</td>')
expect(text).toContain('<td>Unknown License</td>')
})
test('addLicenseToSummary() - adds one table per manifest', () => {
const licenseIssues = {
forbidden: [
createTestChange({manifest: 'package.json'}),
createTestChange({manifest: '.github/workflows/test.yml'})
],
unresolved: [],
unlicensed: []
}
summary.addLicensesToSummary(licenseIssues, defaultConfig)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain('<h4><em>package.json</em></h4>')
expect(text).toContain('<h4><em>.github/workflows/test.yml</em></h4>')
})
test('addLicensesToSummary() - does not include specific license type sub-section if nothing is found', () => {
const licenseIssues = {
forbidden: [],
unlicensed: [],
unresolved: [createTestChange()]
}
summary.addLicensesToSummary(licenseIssues, defaultConfig)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).not.toContain('<td>Incompatible License</td>')
expect(text).not.toContain('<td>Unknown License</td>')
expect(text).toContain('<td>Invalid SPDX License</td>')
})
test('addLicensesToSummary() - includes list of configured allowed licenses', () => {
const licenseIssues = {
forbidden: [createTestChange()],
unresolved: [],
unlicensed: []
}
const config: ConfigurationOptions = {
...defaultConfig,
allow_licenses: ['MIT', 'Apache-2.0']
}
summary.addLicensesToSummary(licenseIssues, config)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain(
'<details><summary><strong>Allowed Licenses</strong>:</summary> MIT, Apache-2.0</details>'
)
})
test('addLicensesToSummary() - includes configured denied license', () => {
const licenseIssues = {
forbidden: [createTestChange()],
unresolved: [],
unlicensed: []
}
const config: ConfigurationOptions = {
...defaultConfig,
deny_licenses: ['MIT', 'Apache-2.0']
}
summary.addLicensesToSummary(licenseIssues, config)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain(
'<details><summary><strong>Denied Licenses</strong>:</summary> MIT, Apache-2.0</details>'
)
})
test('addLicensesToSummary() - includes allowed dependency licences', () => {
const licenseIssues = {
forbidden: [createTestChange()],
unresolved: [],
unlicensed: []
}
const config: ConfigurationOptions = {
...defaultConfig,
allow_dependencies_licenses: ['MIT', 'Apache-2.0']
}
summary.addLicensesToSummary(licenseIssues, config)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain(
'<details><summary><strong>Excluded from license check</strong>:</summary> MIT, Apache-2.0</details>'
)
})
test('addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary() - handles multiple version ranges for same package', async () => {
// Simulates GHSA-gwq6-fmvp-qp68 scenario with multiple version ranges
const pkg8 = createTestChange({
ecosystem: 'nuget',
name: 'Microsoft.NetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm',
version: '8.0.1',
vulnerabilities: [
createTestVulnerability({
advisory_ghsa_id: 'GHSA-test-multi',
advisory_summary: 'Test Multi-Range Advisory',
severity: 'high'
})
]
})
const pkg9 = createTestChange({
ecosystem: 'nuget',
name: 'Microsoft.NetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm',
version: '9.0.1',
vulnerabilities: [
createTestVulnerability({
advisory_ghsa_id: 'GHSA-test-multi',
advisory_summary: 'Test Multi-Range Advisory',
severity: 'high'
})
]
})
// Mock API response with multiple version ranges for same package
mockOctokitRequest.mockResolvedValueOnce({
data: {
vulnerabilities: [
{
package: {
ecosystem: 'NuGet',
name: 'Microsoft.NetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm'
},
vulnerable_version_range: '>= 8.0.0, <= 8.0.20',
first_patched_version: '8.0.21'
},
{
package: {
ecosystem: 'NuGet',
name: 'Microsoft.NetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm'
},
vulnerable_version_range: '>= 9.0.0, <= 9.0.9',
first_patched_version: '9.0.10'
}
]
}
})
const changes = [pkg8, pkg9]
await summary.addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary(changes, 'low')
const text = core.summary.stringify()
// Both packages should have correct patched versions based on their version ranges
expect(text).toContain('8.0.21')
expect(text).toContain('9.0.10')
expect(mockOctokitRequest).toHaveBeenCalledWith('GET /advisories/{ghsa_id}', {
ghsa_id: 'GHSA-test-multi'
})
})
test('addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary() - handles RestSharp GHSA-4rr6-2v9v-wcpc case', async () => {
const pkg = createTestChange({
ecosystem: 'nuget',
name: 'RestSharp',
version: '111.4.1',
vulnerabilities: [
createTestVulnerability({
advisory_ghsa_id: 'GHSA-4rr6-2v9v-wcpc',
advisory_summary:
"CRLF Injection in RestSharp's `RestRequest.AddHeader` method",
severity: 'moderate'
})
]
})
// Mock API response matching actual GitHub Advisory Database response
mockOctokitRequest.mockResolvedValueOnce({
data: {
vulnerabilities: [
{
package: {
ecosystem: 'nuget',
name: 'RestSharp'
},
vulnerable_version_range: '>= 107.0.0-preview.1, < 112.0.0',
first_patched_version: '112.0.0'
}
]
}
})
const changes = [pkg]
await summary.addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary(changes, 'low')
const text = core.summary.stringify()
// Should show the correct patched version
expect(text).toContain('112.0.0')
expect(text).not.toContain('N/A')
expect(mockOctokitRequest).toHaveBeenCalledWith('GET /advisories/{ghsa_id}', {
ghsa_id: 'GHSA-4rr6-2v9v-wcpc'
})
})